El registro continuado de los efectos adversos mejora los resultados quirúrgicos / Continuous monitoring of adverse effects improves surgical outcomes

Antecedentes: Se ha debatido mucho sobre las ventajas e inconvenientes del uso de bases administrativas o de registros clínicos en los programas de mejora de la atención médica. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido revisar la implementación y los resultados de una política de evaluación continua, mediante un registro mantenido por profesionales de un Servicio de Cirugía. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron, de forma prospectiva, todos los pacientes ingresados en el servicio entre los años 2003 y 2022. Se anotaron todos los efectos adversos (EA) acaecidos durante el ingreso, la estancia en centros de convalecencia o en su domicilio durante un periodo mínimo de 30 días tras el alta. Resultados: De 60.125 registros, en 16.802 (27,9%) se registraron 24.846 EA. Hubo un aumento progresivo del número de EA registrados por ingreso (1,17 en 2003 vs. 1,93 en 2022) con una disminución de 26% de los registros con EA (35% en 2003 hasta 25,8% en 2022), de 57,5% en las reoperaciones (de 8 a 3,4%, respectivamente), y de 80% en la mortalidad (de 1,8 a 1%, respectivamente). Es de remarcar la reducción significativa de los EA graves, observada entre los años 2011 y el 2022 (56 vs. 15,6%). Conclusión: Un registro prospectivo de EA creado y mantenido por profesionales del servicio, junto con la presentación y discusión abierta y trasparente de los resultados, produce una mejora sostenida de los resultados en un servicio quirúrgico de un hospital universitario.(AU)

Background: There has been significant debate about the advantages and disadvantages of using administrative databases or clinical registries in healthcare improvement programs. The aim of this study was to review the implementation and outcomes of an accountability policy through a registry maintained by professionals of the surgical department.Materials and methods: All patients admitted to the department between 2003 and 2022 were prospectively included. All adverse events (AEs) occurring during the admission, convalescent care in facilities, or at home for a minimum period of 30 days after discharge were recorded. Results: Out of 60,125 records, 24,846 AEs were documented in 16,802 cases (27.9%). There was a progressive increase in the number of AEs recorded per admission (1.17 in 2003 vs. 1.93 in 2022) with a 26% decrease in entries with AEs (from 35% in 2003 to 25.8% in 2022), a 57.5% decrease in reoperations (from 8.0% to 3.4%, respectively), and an 80% decrease in mortality (from 1.8% to 1%, respectively). It is noteworthy that a significant reduction in severe AEs was observed between 2011 and 2022 (56% vs. 15.6%). Conclusion: A prospective registry of AEs created and maintained by health professionals, along with transparent presentation and discussion of the results, leads to sustained improvement in outcomes in a surgical department of a university hospital.(AU)

Continuous monitoring of adverse effects improves surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There has been significant debate about the advantages and disadvantages of using administrative databases or clinical registry in healthcare improvement programs. The aim of this study was to review the implementation and outcomes of an accountability policy through a registry maintained by professionals of the surgical department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted to the department between 2003 and 2022 were prospectively included. All adverse events (AEs) occurring during the admission, convalescent care in facilities, or at home for a minimum period of 30 days after discharge were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 60,125 records, 24,846 AEs were documented in 16,802 cases (27.9%). There was a progressive increase in the number of AEs recorded per admission (1.17 in 2003 vs. 1.93 in 2022) with a 26% decrease in entries with AEs (from 35.0% in 2003 to 25.8% in 2022), a 57.5% decrease in reoperations (from 8.0% to 3.4%, respectively), and an 80% decrease in mortality (from 1.8% to 1.0%, respectively). It is noteworthy that a significant reduction in severe AEs was observed between 2011 and 2022 (56% vs. 15.6%). CONCLUSION: A prospective registry of AEs created and maintained by health professionals, along with transparent presentation and discussion of the results, leads to sustained improvement in outcomes in a surgical department of a university hospital.

Tratamiento de la macromastia sintomática en una unidad de mama. Resultados de la reducción mamaria evaluados mediante el cuestionario BREAST-Q / Treatment of symptomatic macromastia in a breast unit. Outcomes analysis of breast reduction using BREAST-Q

Introducción: El BREAST-Q (módulo reducción mamaria) es un cuestionario específico y validado para evaluar la reducción mamaria en el tratamiento de la macromastia sintomática, ofreciendo información sobre la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción de las pacientes. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte de 34 pacientes tratadas mediante reducción mamaria bilateral, en una unidad de mama en 2017-2020, que fueron encuestadas con la versión adaptada al castellano del BREAST-Q. Las pacientes cumplimentaron el cuestionario en el mes previo a la cirugía y después de esta. Los cambios de las puntuaciones pre- y postoperatorias en los diferentes dominios se analizaron mediante la prueba de rangos con signo de Wilcoxon. La significación estadística fue determinada con valores de p<0,05. Resultados: El tiempo medio desde la cirugía a la encuesta postoperatoria fue 16 (DE 9) meses. Complicaciones o secuelas posquirúrgicas sucedieron en 14 (42%) pacientes con 23 eventos. Las puntuaciones preoperatorias, medianas y rango intercuartílico, en la satisfacción con las mamas (28, 26), bienestar psicológico (33, 14), físico (42, 19) y sexual (34, 14) mejoraron en la encuesta postoperatoria a (82, 15), (81,29), (82, 30) y (90, 38), respectivamente, con significación estadística, p<0,001. Conclusiones: La primera aplicación del BREAST-Q versión en castellano para españolas a pacientes con macromastia tratadas quirúrgicamente en una unidad de mama demuestra que la reducción mamaria mejora la calidad de vida de las pacientes y, que estas están muy satisfechas con el resultado de la cirugía y su cirujano, aunque la información recibida es mejorable. (AU)

Introduction: The BREAST-Q (breast reduction module) is a specific and validated questionnaire to evaluate breast reduction in the treatment of symptomatic macromastia, offering information on their quality of life and degree of satisfaction. Methods: Prospective study of a cohort of 34 patients treated by bilateral breast reduction in a breast unit in 2017–2020 surveyed with the Spanish version of BREAST-Q version 2. The statistical study to assess the effect of reduction, changes from the pre to postoperative scores of the domains were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was determined with P values <.05. Results: The mean time elapsed from surgery to the postoperative survey was 16 (SD 9) months. Post-surgical complications or sequelae occurred in 14 (42%) patients with 23 events. The preoperative scores, median and interquartile range, in satisfaction with the breasts (28, 26), psychological (33, 14), physical (42, 19) and sexual (34, 14) well-being improved in the postoperative survey to (82, 15), (81, 29), (82, 30) and (90, 38), respectively. These changes were statistically significant, P<.001. Conclusions: The first application of the BREAST-Q in its version in Spanish for Spanish women in patients with symptomatic macromastia treated surgically in a breast unit shows that breast reduction improves the quality of life of patients and that they are very satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and its surgeon, although the information received should clearly be improved. (AU)

Treatment of symptomatic macromastia in a breast unit. Outcomes analysis of breast reduction using BREAST-Q.

INTRODUCTION: The BREAST-Q (breast reduction module) is a specific and validated questionnaire to evaluate breast reduction in the treatment of symptomatic macromastia, offering information on their quality of life and degree of satisfaction. METHODS: Prospective study of a cohort of 34 patients treated by bilateral breast reduction in a breast unit in 2017-2020 surveyed with the Spanish version of BREAST-Q version 2. The statistical study to assess the effect of reduction, changes from the pre to postoperative scores of the domains were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was determined with p values ​​<0.05. RESULTS: The mean time elapsed from surgery to the postoperative survey was 16 (SD 9) months. Post-surgical complications or sequelae occurred in 14 (42%) patients with 23 events. The preoperative scores, median and interquartile range, in satisfaction with the breasts (28, 26), psychological (33, 14), physical (42, 19) and sexual (34, 14) well-being improved in the postoperative survey to (82, 15), (81.29), (82, 30) and (90, 38), respectively. These changes were statistically significant, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The first application of the BREAST-Q in its version in Spanish for Spanish women in patients with symptomatic macromastia treated surgically in a breast unit shows that breast reduction improves the quality of life of patients and that they are very satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and its surgeon, although the information received should clearly be improved.

Executive summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) in antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery / Resumen ejecutivo del Documento de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) y de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) en profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and bacterial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery

La profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía es una de las medidas más eficaces para la prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica, aunque su uso es con frecuencia inadecuado, pudiendo incrementar el riesgo de infección, toxicidades y resistencias bacterianas. Debido al avance en las técnicas quirúrgicas y la emergencia de microorganismos multirresistentes, las actuales pautas de profilaxis precisan ser revisadas. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SEIMC), conjuntamente con la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC), ha revisado y actualizado las recomendaciones de profilaxis antimicrobiana para adaptarlas a cada tipo de intervención quirúrgica y a la epidemiología actual. En este documento se recogen las recomendaciones de los antimicrobianos utilizados en profilaxis en los diferentes procedimientos, las dosis, la duración, la profilaxis en huéspedes especiales, y en situación epidemiológica de multirresistencia, de tal forma que permitan un manejo estandarizado, un uso racional, seguro y efectivo de los mismos en la cirugía electiva

Resumen ejecutivo del Documento de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) y de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) en profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía / Executive summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) in antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery

La profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía es una de las medidas más eficaces para la prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica, aunque su uso es con frecuencia inadecuado, pudiendo incrementar el riesgo de infección, toxicidades y resistencias bacterianas. Debido al avance en las técnicas quirúrgicas y la emergencia de microorganismos multirresistentes las actuales pautas de profilaxis precisan ser revisadas. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SEIMC), conjuntamente con la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) ha revisado y actualizado las recomendaciones de profilaxis antimicrobiana para adaptarlas a cada tipo de intervención quirúrgica y a la epidemiología actual. En este documento se recogen las recomendaciones de los antimicrobianos utilizados en profilaxis en los diferentes procedimientos, las dosis, la duración, la profilaxis en huéspedes especiales, y en situación epidemiológica de multirresistencia, de tal forma que permitan un manejo estandarizado, un uso racional, seguro y efectivo de los mismos en la cirugía electiva

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and antimicrobial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. The Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery

Executive summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) in antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and bacterial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery.

Executive summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) in antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. / Resumen ejecutivo del Documento de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) y de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) en profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and antimicrobial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. The Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery.

Medidas de prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica en cirugía general. Documento de posicionamiento de la Sección de Infección Quirúrgica de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos / Surgical site infection prevention measures in General Surgery: Position statement by the Surgical Infections Division of the Spanish Association of Surgery

La infección de localización quirúrgica se asocia a prolongación de la estancia hospitalaria, aumento de la morbilidad, mortalidad y gasto sanitario. La adherencia a paquetes sistematizados que incluyan medidas de prevención validadas científicamente consigue disminuir la tasa de infección postoperatoria. La Sección de Infección Quirúrgica de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos ha realizado una revisión crítica de la evidencia científica y las más recientes guías internacionales, para seleccionar las medidas con mayor grado de evidencia a fin de facilitar su aplicación en los servicios de cirugía españoles. Cuentan con mayor grado de evidencia: no eliminación del vello del campo quirúrgico o eliminación con maquinilla eléctrica, descontaminación de la piel con soluciones alcohólicas, profilaxis antibiótica sistémica adecuada (inicio 30-60 minutos antes de la incisión, uso preferente en monodosis, administración de dosis intraoperatoria si indicada), mantenimiento de la normotermia y el control de la glucemia perioperatoria

Surgical site infection is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, as well as a poorer patient quality of life. Many hospitals have adopted scientifically-validated guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. Most of these protocols have resulted in improved postoperative results. The Surgical Infection Division of the Spanish Association of Surgery conducted a critical review of the scientific evidence and the most recent international guidelines in order to select measures with the highest degree of evidence to be applied in Spanish surgical services. The best measures are: no removal or clipping of hair from the surgical field, skin decontamination with alcohol solutions, adequate systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (administration within 30-60 minutes before the incision in a single preoperative dose; intraoperative re-dosing when indicated), maintenance of normothermia and perioperative maintenance of glucose levels

Immunomodulatory Roles of PARP-1 and PARP-2: Impact on PARP-Centered Cancer Therapies.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and PARP-2 are enzymes which post-translationally modify proteins through poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation)-the transfer of ADP-ribose chains onto amino acid residues-with a resultant modulation of protein function. Many targets of PARP-1/2-dependent PARylation are involved in the DNA damage response and hence, the loss of these proteins disrupts a wide range of biological processes, from DNA repair and epigenetics to telomere and centromere regulation. The central role of these PARPs in DNA metabolism in cancer cells has led to the development of PARP inhibitors as new cancer therapeutics, both as adjuvant treatment potentiating chemo-, radio-, and immuno-therapies and as monotherapy exploiting cancer-specific defects in DNA repair. However, a cancer is not just made up of cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment also includes multiple other cell types, particularly stromal and immune cells. Interactions between these cells-cancerous and non-cancerous-are known to either favor or limit tumorigenesis. In recent years, an important role of PARP-1 and PARP-2 has been demonstrated in different aspects of the immune response, modulating both the innate and adaptive immune system. It is now emerging that PARP-1 and PARP-2 may not only impact cancer cell biology, but also modulate the anti-tumor immune response. Understanding the immunomodulatory roles of PARP-1 and PARP-2 may provide invaluable clues to the rational development of more selective PARP-centered therapies which target both the cancer and its microenvironment.

Coordinated signals from PARP-1 and PARP-2 are required to establish a proper T cell immune response to breast tumors in mice.

Poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP)-1 and PARP-2 play an essential role in the DNA damage response. Based on this effect of PARP in the tumor cell itself, PARP inhibitors have emerged as new therapeutic tools both approved and in clinical trials. However, the interactome of multiple other cell types, particularly T cells, within the tumor microenvironment are known to either favor or limit tumorigenesis. Here, we bypassed the embryonic lethality of dually PARP-1/PARP-2-deficient mice by using a PARP-1-deficient mouse with a Cd4-promoter-driven deletion of PARP-2 in T cells to investigate the understudied role of these PARPs in the modulation of T cell responses against AT-3-induced breast tumors. We found that dual PARP-1/PARP-2-deficiency in T cells promotes tumor growth while single deficiency of each protein limited tumor progression. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating cells in dual PARP-1/PARP-2-deficiency host-mice revealed a global change in immunological profile and impaired recruitment and activation of T cells. Conversely, single PARP-1 and PARP-2-deficiency tends to produce an environment with an active and partially upregulated immune response. Our findings pinpoint opposite effects of single and dual PARP-1 and PARP-2-deficiency in modulating the antitumor response with an impact on tumor progression, and will have implications for the development of more selective PARP-centered therapies.

Surgical site infection prevention measures in General Surgery: Position statement by the Surgical Infections Division of the Spanish Association of Surgery. / Medidas de prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica en cirugía general. Documento de posicionamiento de la Sección de Infección Quirúrgica de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos.

Surgical site infection is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, as well as a poorer patient quality of life. Many hospitals have adopted scientifically-validated guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. Most of these protocols have resulted in improved postoperative results. The Surgical Infection Division of the Spanish Association of Surgery conducted a critical review of the scientific evidence and the most recent international guidelines in order to select measures with the highest degree of evidence to be applied in Spanish surgical services. The best measures are: no removal or clipping of hair from the surgical field, skin decontamination with alcohol solutions, adequate systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (administration within 30-60minutes before the incision in a single preoperative dose; intraoperative re-dosing when indicated), maintenance of normothermia and perioperative maintenance of glucose levels.

Tratamiento quirúrgico de rescate en paciente con melanoma metastásico con mutación BRAF V600E / Rescue surgery in a patient with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600E mutation

No disponible